SCHEDULE FREE WEB DEMO

Soil Nail Walls - Safety Factors

Maybe not as safe as you think!

Soil nail wall analysis are typically performed with established traditional slope stability methods. In all methods a nail force is established at each intersecting slice. How this force is used next can affect the calculated safety factors. We will be illustrating the basic approaches below.

In the most basic approach many engineers would use a circular analysis with Bishop which only accounts for moment equilibrium. There are obvious limitations with this approach, and we will not be explaining them in full detail here!

If we wanted to be more theoretically consistent, we can select a method such as Spencer or Morgenstern-Price which considers both moment and force equilibrium. In typical calculations the nail forces would enter the full stability calculation at each slice so we can achieve static equilibrium. If very big forces are assumed then some strange numerical results can be obtained. In fact, the numerics would suggest that the soil mass movement would be happening in the opposite direction, so one needs to be considerate.

On the other hand, to avoid these issues, we could perform an available shear resistance method. In this case, we can compute the required shear required for a safety factor of one without any soil nails and also determine the available shear resistance by the soil. When we incorporate soil nails, we can calculate the shear resistance provided by the nails without consideration for changing the summation of forces on each slice. The new safety factor can then be defined as:

FS= (shear by nails + available shear by soil)/ (shear required for FS =1.0)

Take a look at this simple example below to see how the different methods compared when we evaluated them with our soil nailing software SnailPlus:

The Bishop method, produced a safety factor of 1.37, which would have been above the required for temporary short term conditions.

Bishop analysis for simple soil nail wall with SnailPlus software

Using Spencer's method with a circular surface and the traditional approach gives slighly smaller safety factors, close to 1.34:

Spencer analysis with traditional method for simple soil nail wall with SnailPlus software

Using the available shear method with Spencer gives a significantly smaller FS:

Spencer analysis with available shear method for simple soil nail wall with SnailPlus software

What method is finally selected requires engineering judgment, but we encourage that all methods are considered at-least at the preliminary analysis level. Obviously, when evaluating soil nail wall stability analysis we should be considering more complex sliding mechanisms and not only circular slip surfaces.

The available shear method is incorporated in our updated soil nailing software SnailPlus.

Presentations_SnailPlus_Software.png

 

Learn How to Design an Excavation
in Minutes!

Book a Free Web Presentation

Trusted By

1. Logo Arup.JPG
2. Logo Keller.JPG
3. Logo PBA.JPG
4. Logo AECOM.JPG
5. Logo Hatch.JPG
6. Logo Mottmac.JPG
7. Logo Jacobs.JPG
8. Logo GZA.JPG
9. Logo GarretFlaming.JPG
10. Logo Lavalin.JPG
11. Logo Magnusson Klem.JPG
12. Logo MoDOT.JPG
13. Logo URS.JPG
14. Logo Stalworth.JPG
15. Logo Kleinfelder.JPG
16. Logo Samsung.JPG
17. Logo Gepfreeze.JPG
37._Logo_ASAP.jpg
19. Logo GulfConstruct.JPG
20. Logo Temeltas.JPG
21. Logo AttikoMetro.JPG
22. Logo Flatiron.JPG
23. Logo Kozaba.JPG
24. Logo Siefert.JPG
25. Logo AlGhuair.JPG
26. Logo Earthtech.JPG
27. Logo Russo.JPG
28. Logo Danbro.JPG
29. Logo Atkins.JPG
30. Logo LBFoster.JPG
31. Logo Dominion.JPG
32. Logo Acons.JPG
33. Logo NSCC.JPG
34. Logo Econstruct.JPG
35. Logo AUD.JPG
18. Logo Eptisa.JPG