Prediction of load-settlement response of helical piles in compression

At the 2014 DFI Helical Piles and Tiebacks seminar in St. Charles, MO, our CEO Mr. Konstantakos presented a new method for predicting the load-settlement response of helical piles. Traditionally, helical piles have been designed on an ultimate load basis with most geotechnical engineers having few clues about their true geotechnical response. On the other hand, ultimate capacity for helical piles is typically realized at greater settlement values that are not reached in most axial load tests.

The lack of understanding of true helical pile behavior and response is a significant barrier to the wider adoption of helical piles!

Did you know? IBC 1810. requires that "Ultimate pile capacity shall be determined by a register engineer with consideration given to the total and differential settlement at design loads in accordance with 1810.2.3"

Ultimate capacities are defined from ultimate load criteria that may involve any of the following methods:

1.Davisson Offset Limit

2.Brinch-Hansen 90% Criteria

3.Butler-Hoy Criterion

4.Other Methods Approved by the building official



The settlement response of helical piles theoretically comprises of elastic shortening of the helical pile section, the elastoplastic response of the soil against the shaft, the soil behaving in a cylindrical type mode in between helixes, and the elastoplastic response of the leading helical plate. If the individual plate failure mode is controlling then the cylinder response can be replaced by the individual plate behavior.

Basic Settlement Response Theory

Fleming (1992) presented procedure for estimating axial pile response for rigid piles:


MS  =   Shaft factor, tangent slope of the origin

of hyperbolic function for shaft friction   (Randolph 1992)

DS   =   Shaft diameter (or cylinder diameter)

US   =   Ultimate shaft resistance

PS   =   Applied shaft traction

Theory of elasticity settlement under a circular footing

ΔP=π/4   qa/EB   DPL  (1- v^2 )f

qa     =   Applied stress on footing (average)

EB     =  Modulus of elasticity of bearing soils

DPL   =   Circular footing diameter (in this case, helical plate   diameter)

f  =   0.85 Shape factor


Using the hyperbolic soil model, a true non-linear approach can be simulated.

Sample load tests used to calibrate method

The following images show a series of load tests used in the calibration of the proposed settlement method.

Settlement Response Verification 1.png
Settlement Response Verification 2.png
Settlement Response Verification 3.png
Settlement Response Verification 4.png
Settlement Response Verification 5.png
Settlement Response Verification 6.png


Learn what our program can do for you!
Save time and effort!

Book a Free Web Presentation

Trusted By

1. Logo Arup.JPG
2. Logo Keller.JPG
3. Logo PBA.JPG
5. Logo Hatch.JPG
6. Logo Mottmac.JPG
7. Logo Jacobs.JPG
8. Logo GZA.JPG
9. Logo GarretFlaming.JPG
10. Logo Lavalin.JPG
11. Logo Magnusson Klem.JPG
12. Logo MoDOT.JPG
13. Logo URS.JPG
14. Logo Stalworth.JPG
15. Logo Kleinfelder.JPG
16. Logo Samsung.JPG
17. Logo Gepfreeze.JPG
19. Logo GulfConstruct.JPG
20. Logo Temeltas.JPG
21. Logo AttikoMetro.JPG
22. Logo Flatiron.JPG
23. Logo Kozaba.JPG
24. Logo Siefert.JPG
25. Logo AlGhuair.JPG
26. Logo Earthtech.JPG
27. Logo Russo.JPG
28. Logo Danbro.JPG
29. Logo Atkins.JPG
30. Logo LBFoster.JPG
31. Logo Dominion.JPG
32. Logo Acons.JPG
33. Logo NSCC.JPG
34. Logo Econstruct.JPG
35. Logo AUD.JPG
18. Logo Eptisa.JPG