Tel: 1-206-279-3300

2-Day Deep Excavation and Soil nail wall design Workshop

16 PDH @ Plano, TX

Sep 30, Oct 1st, 2019

Only 5 spots left!

Renaissance Hotel, Legacy West

Renaissance Hotel Plano Legacy West

Early registration ends soon!

DeepEX 2019 is here!

Deep Excavation Software

DeepEX 2017 talk to it and design your deep excavation!

Excavations in 3D, VR, AR

Holographic model of a deep excavation with HoloDeepEX

Get the Free 3D Viewer


Free 45 min webinar

Deep Excavation Design

Fully booked!

Free Helical Pile Design Webinars:

To be announced

New Deep Foundation Software

DeepFND - Deep Foundation Software, caissons, CFA, drilled piles, driven piles, concrete, timber


New helical pile software HelixPile
Signup for a free trial and get our free pdf on the five most common errors in deep excavation design
Our Software Solutions
DeepFND 2020: Deep Foundation software (NEW: Pile-Group/Pile Raft Analysis!)
DeepEX 2019: Deep Excavation software
Soldier pile walls
Sheet pile walls
Secant pile Walls
Tangent piles
Diaphragm Walls
Soldier and Tremied Concrete
Soil Mix walls
Combined king pile sheet piles
Slope stability
Cost estimation for braced excavations
Waler-Strut Cofferdams
Snail-Plus 2019: Soil nailing - soil nailing walls
SiteMaster: Inclinometer software (adopted by Geokon)
HelixPile: Helical Pile Software
RC-Solver: Concrete Design ACI-318, EC2, EC8
Steel-Beam: Steel beam column design, full equations, AISC, EC3

Drilled Pile Load Tests in Atlanta, GA - Calibration and Evaluation of Different Methods with DeepFND

In 1993 FHWA in association with ADSC and ASCE released a report No. 41-30-2175. The report was prepared by Georgia Tech Research Corporation, from the Georgia Institute of Technology. The research study focused on the axial capacity of drilled piles in Piedmont residuum. Two 30-inch diameter drilled piles were installed and load tested to failure; a) one floating in the piedmont residuum at 55ft depth, and b) one reaching to bedrock at 72ft depth.

A very thorough geotechnical investigation was conducted that included a series of lab and in-situ tests. Soils at the site consisted of 15ft of fill, Piedmont residuum SM to 60 ft depth, partially weathered rock to 72ft depth, and Granitic Gneiss below. Ground water was encountered at 56 to 62ft depth.

Equipped with knowledge of the two load tests, we conducted a series of back-calibrations to examine what procedures are best suited to match actual load test results. All calibrations and investigations were performed with the DeepFND software by Deep Excavation LLC. In all cases the FHWA GEC-10 recommendations were incorporated. The following scenarios were examined:

a) Using lab test defined strength parameters for the residuum sands (RES) to calibrate the floating pile case. It was found that a friction angle of 35.5 degrees would accurately reflect load test data on the floating pile.

b) Calibrating the modulus of elasticity of the rock layer to match the observed end bearing pile response.

c) Using SPT values and different ways of estimating the friction angle to match observed response.

In case a) the geotechnical investigation reported a range of friction angles close to 35.8 degrees. We found though that equally important was simulating properly the elasticity of the side resisting soil springs.

In case b) The modulus of elasticity of the bedrock was calibrated to match the observed response. In case c) we experimented with various methods of estimating soil properties from SPT, especially the effective friction angle of the Piedmont residuum. Our analysis indicates that the Triaxial compression method for estimating the friction angle provided more realistic estimates of the effective friction angle vs. recommendations by Kullhawy-Chen (incorporated in FHWA GEC-10) for this case. The major differences though were obtained in the end bearing capacity where the Kullhawy-Chen approach estimated about 15% greater axial capacities.

Load tests on 30 inch drilled piles in Atlanta Residuum soils, Georgia, with soil strengths from lab tests
Case A: 55ft pile load test vs. calibration with soil properties obtained from laboratory test data
Load test on 30 inch drilled piles end bearing in Gneiss, Atlanta, GA
Case B: 72ft load test on 30 inch drilled pile end bearing in Piedmont Gneiss

Load tests on 30 inch drilled piles in Atlanta, Georgia, with estimates obtained from SPT methods
Case C: 55ft floating pile calibration vs. SPT estimated properties with Triaxial Compression Equation

DeepFND Pricing

DeepFND 2020: $1,650.00
DeepFND Versions