Cantilever walls - Cantilever wall design
Cantilever walls are walls that do not have any supports and thus have a free unsupported excavation. Cantilever walls restrain retained earth by the passive resistance provided by the soil below the excavation. Many engineers use the cantilever wall term to actually describe gravity walls. In reality both gravity and vertical embedded walls types can be categorized as cantilever if no lateral bracing support is provided by means of tiebacks, struts, etc. This sections examines vertical cantilever walls and the basic design methods used for cantilever wall analysis.
or click here to arrange a free online video presentation
of deepxcav on secant pile walls with our technical experts
In general, the maximum excavation for a cantilever wall can reach up to 6m or 18ft. Deeper cantilever walls have been constructed but these required more expensive wall systems such as T-type diaphragm walls. Cantilever walls offer some advantages:
Advantages of cantilever walls:
Disadvantages of cantilever walls:
Analysis methods for cantilever walls:
Cantilever walls are very often designed with limit equilibrium methods. In this approach, the designer calculates active and passive earth pressures. Water and other surcharges are also applied if applicable. Two methods in Limit Equilibrium analysis are available:
a) Free earth method for cantilever walls:
This is the simplest approach. It requires that the designer only balances the overturning and resisting moments. Active earth pressures are assumed on the retained side and passive earth pressures are typically assumed on the excavation side. The required embedment for a safety factor of 1 is then obtained at the point of zero moment. The limitation of the method is that shear forces are not balanced. As a result, it is recommended that the obtained embedment for FS=1 is multiplied by approximately 1.2 (to obtain the wall embedment for a safety factor of 1).
b) Fixed earth method for cantilever walls:
The fixed earth method offers a more robust approach as it balances both overturning moments and shears. However, analytical solutions for the fixed earth method are limited to very special conditions. The fixed earth method works by finding the critical pivot point about which rotational moments and shear forces balance. This is done by assuming active earth pressures on the excavation side and passive earth pressures on the retained side below the pivot point. Since closed form solutions with the fixed earth method are limited it is recommended that a Winkler spring analysis will typically offer the best results instead of the classical fixed earth solution.

Copyright © 2003 - 2012 Deep Excavation LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Web Development by QV-WEB