Tel: 1-206-279-3300

DeepEX 2020

Solving Deep Excavation Design

DeepEX 2017 talk to it and design your deep excavation!

Deep Foundation Software, Pile Rafts, Pile Groups

From soil estimation to axial and lateral pile capacity

DeepFND - Deep Foundation Software, caissons, CFA, drilled piles, driven piles, concrete, timber

From soil estimation to helical pile settlement estimation.

New helical pile software HelixPile

Excavations in 3D, VR, AR

Holographic model of a deep excavation with HoloDeepEX

Get the Free 3D Viewer

______________________

Free 45 min webinar

Deep Excavation Design

Fully booked!

Free Helical Pile Design Webinars:

To be announced

2-Day Deep Excavation and Soil nail wall design Workshop

16 PDH @ Plano, TX

Sep 30, Oct 1st, 2019

Only 1 spot left!

Renaissance Hotel, Legacy West

Renaissance Hotel Plano Legacy West

Early registration ends soon!

Signup for a free trial and get our free pdf on the five most common errors in deep excavation design
What do you want to design?
DeepFND 2020: Deep Foundation software (NEW: Pile-Group/Pile Raft Analysis!)
DeepEX 2020: Deep Excavation software
Soldier pile walls
Sheet pile walls
Secant pile Walls
Tangent piles
Diaphragm Walls
Soldier and Tremied Concrete
Soil Mix walls
Combined king pile sheet piles
Slope stability
Cost estimation for braced excavations
Waler-Strut Cofferdams
Snail-Plus 2019: Soil nailing - soil nailing walls
SiteMaster: Inclinometer software (adopted by Geokon)
HelixPile: Helical Pile Software
RC-Solver: Concrete Design ACI-318, EC2, EC8
Steel-Beam: Steel beam column design, full equations, AISC, EC3

SLURRY WALL EXCAVATION CASE STUDY #2: Post Office Square Garage, Boston, MA

The Post Office Square Garage includes a 7-level, 75'-deep underground garage, constructed with the top/down method, bounded by Franklin, Milk, Pearl, and Congress Streets. Existing buildings up to 40 stories tall are located adjacent to the site. Basement excavation was completed in 1990.

A perimeter slurry wall, 3.0' thick, extended approximately 10ft into bedrock, provided both the temporary and permanent earth pressure support for the excavation. The diaphragm wall is internally braced by the garage floor slabs (LL1-LL7), which are supported by interior steel H-section columns founded on bedrock at depths 85' to 96' below the ground surface. The interior columns, installed using slurry trenching methods, were concreted into till and rock to form load bearing elements (LBE).

Calculations for this project were done by DeepXcav. Click here to download it or arrange a FREE online demonstration to know more about DeepXcav 2011 performance and features

Most of the site is located within the old Boston peninsula; however, the northwestern section is located in an area reclaimed from the sea. Soils in the two sections (3: E-E, D-D) comprise 15' of fill, local pockets of organic silt, 30' to 40' thick clay (Boston Blue Clay, BBC), 0' to 16' of sand, 3' to 20' of glacial till, weathered bedrock, and sound bedrock.

All the walls bulged towards the excavation by up to dW=2.2" at elevations in the clay (LL3 to LL4). The walls deflected the most near the current excavation level until the LL3 or LL4 slab was completed. Thereafter, maximum wall deflections did not change significantly in magnitude and in position.

As the excavation progressed beneath LL3 and LL4 the upper part of the wall was slightly pushed back into the retained soil. At the same time, wall deflections beneath the LL3 level steadily increased. One possible mechanism could be that as the excavation progressed deeper the lower slabs pick up more of the total lateral earth load and thus the load that the upper slabs shared decreased. As a result, the upper slabs slightly expand and the top of the slurry wall is pushed back. Thermal expansion and creep deformations of the upper slabs could also have contributed to the deflection decrease at the top of the wall. When the base of excavation was reached, there was very little wall bending above the LL3 and beneath the LL5 slabs. The rock where the slurry walls were keyed appeared to act as a pin support.

Building settlements were much smaller than surface settlements. The Meridien Hotel settled up to 0.65". Buildings supported by deep foundations were essentially unaffected by the excavation. Surface settlements on the other hand reached up to 2.75" within 20' from the excavation along Pearl Street, where wall movements were the largest. Again, a large settlement increase occurred by the time the LL1 slab was installed. Surface settlements further away from the excavation started increasing when the excavation progressed beneath the LL3 slab, as a result of deep soil movements. Subsurface settlements were much smaller than surface settlements (0.65" maximum, typically less than 0.4").

The excavation did not affect water levels in the fill, while slightly lowered the piezometric head in the clay by 10'. However, dewatering within the site and excavation beneath LL3, decreased the piezometric head in the rock at one location by 45'.

The excavation did not affect adversely any adjacent structures. However, deformations were larger than expected because the backfill material that was used for the LBEs was softer than the surrounding soil. Thus wall deflections were larger along the eastern wall (2.0"), where the LBEs formed a parallel to the wall zone of softer material. A major portion of the deformations occurred in the initial stages of the excavation, before the roof or the first level slab was installed. During these first stages, the lateral earth loads were transferred to the softer LBE backfill material, through out the wall depth, thus causing large cantilever movements. Movements were smaller in locations where the LBEs were further away from wall.

Essential software tools for engineers!