|
|
DIAPHRAGM WALL CASE STUDY #4:
World Trade Center Recovery, NY, NY
The tragic events of 9/11/01 have left few people untouched.
One of the greatest "heroes" of the day has been the
"bathtub" of the World Trade Center, being able to resist
the tremendous forces generated by the destruction while holding
back the Hudson river from entering the New York City tunnel system.
The "bathtub", is actually a 3 ft thick (0.91 m) structural
slurry wall that
keeps water and soil out of the excavation. The term was actually
incidentally used by the highly respected geotechnical engineer
Mr. George Tamaro of MRCE in a PBS
interview, and has ever since gained wide acceptance in the non
engineering world.
|
|
DeepXcav 2010 Software!

|
The World Trade Center (Saxena, 1974), New York, is one of the deepest early
diaphragm wall projects in the US. The slurry wall was keyed into bedrock or
hardpan by 8'. Six levels of rock anchors braced the excavation in most
locations except at a section adjacent to a subway tunnel where only four
levels were used. The wall cantilevered up to 6" before the first bracing
level was installed, and was thereafter pushed back into the soil by up to
2.4" when all anchors were installed. Only, at the section adjacent to the
subway did the wall moved towards the excavation (2.4") in a cantilevering
mode. In that location, the first anchor level was installed under the subway,
35' below the surface.
While rock anchors provided temporary excavation support, permanent
bracing of the slurry
wall was provided by the original basement slabs of the WTC.
When the twin towers collapsed, the falling structures demolished
most of these supporting slabs. Portions of the permanent basement
slabs crushed when the twin towers collapsed into the WTC basement.
The result was a drastic reduction in the effective lateral support
of the perimeter slurry wall. Consequently, the slurry
wall experienced deformations in excess of 2 ft into the WTC
basement. The slurry wall withstood both the large deformations
and the large unsupported lengths. The stability of the WTC slurry
wall immediately after the collapse is mainly to be attributed
to the ability of poorly or non-supported individual panels to
cantilever from the base, to benefit from any residual floor diaphragms,
and to span adjacent panels that had adequate lateral support.
Nonetheless, the stability of the
slurry wall had to be ensured by proper anchoring before the
recovery crews could "safely" reach the old subgrade
75 ft beneath the Hudson River. The general philosophy of the
redesign was that the old anchor system had to be replicated in
some fashion. Most importantly, the first level of rock anchors
was prestressed with considerably excess force to account for
the possibility of further collapses in the basement. Relatively
small deformations occurred after the first level of anchors was
prestressed. Many panels were pushed back towards the retained
soil as anchor installation proceeded deeper (considering the
position of the wall before the first level of anchors was installed
as initial). As expected, individual panel exhibited considerably
different deformations. Moskowitz and Tamaro (2002) discuss this
subject in more detail.

Exhibit 1: World Trade Center Bathtub and
Original Conditions (adapted from NY Times 9/18/01)

Exhibit 2: Excavation at World Trade Center
Liberty & Greenwich, 1968
|